Even though it’s mid-November, traveling has been sounding good; and though Chaucer reminds us that it’s in April “Thanne longen folk to go on pilgrimages,” the desire can happen anytime. Humans get those restless feet, roaming hearts.
Then there’s Friday, November the 13th, which must top the list of All-Time Craziest Thirteenths in American history: Microsoft goes down; a New Orleans Riverboat gets struck by another boat while in dock; and due to [checks notes] an “AI malfunction,” the government’s FAA grounds all flights until a ransom of $50 billion dollars is paid to the FAA—just to name three. So let’s ask the victims of this incompetence and malfeasance, including the millions of people stranded in American airports, those in need of serious deliveries and communications that are going nowhere, the dozens of sports teams that cannot play their games (just to name a few of the inconvenienced and thwarted), what they are thinking of “travel” right now. (Somewhere Susan Collins is concerned.)
So instead of going anywhere beyond the easy reach of subway, train, and bus, I guess I’ll keep reading. Patti Smith, my latest reread, has got me thinking of the writers who have influenced me, stayed with me, been my constant life traveling companions. (I have artists, musicians, and actors, too, but today I’m thinking about writers.) What writers have been your constant companions? Go ahead—jot down a list.

The writers I’ve most connected to and drawn from in my life are, first, Oscar Wilde in my teens; Virginia Woolf from my twenties to forties; and Patti Smith in my fifties and sixties. They couldn’t be more different, on the surface—but it was their daring to be themselves and in public, whatever the cost, that dazzles me. I’m not brave like that; possibly I read them to screw up the courage to become whatever it is I’m supposed to be. Or, more possibly, I read them for themselves.
But what I have, and have always had, that connects me to all three: awareness, observation, listening to conversations, watching the room, and using my imagination to make memory manifest now, to tell the story. All three were keenly aware of their worlds, the political moment, and never ignored it, but their art came first. (I aspire to that last bit.)
I’ve been unable, up to this point in my life at any rate, to go very deep—my limitation in any art I attempt is apparent to me. Even when I feel something deeply, the feeling only lasts seconds. Penetrating to the deepest places, therefore, is something I look for in authors, and usually it takes years and multiple readings to follow where they lead and feel it completely. Living longer will do that.
My friend Jean, a poet, introduced me to the poetry of Wallace Stevens when we were in graduate school. (As with most writers, it’s male essayists, poets, and novelists—Thoreau, Emerson, Frost, Steinbeck—that were key to her development and remain most important. Woolf looked to Shakespeare and the classics; Wilde to Dante and the classics, Smith to the French authors Genet and Rimbaud.) This poem struck me, particularly part one:
Of the Surface of Things
By Wallace Stevens (1879 –1955)
I
In my room, the world is beyond my understanding;
But when I walk I see that it consists of three or four
hills and a cloud.
II
From my balcony, I survey the yellow air,
Reading where I have written,
“The spring is like a belle undressing.”
III
The gold tree is blue,
The singer has pulled his cloak over his head.
The moon is in the folds of the cloak.
(This poem is in the public domain.)
I don’t pretend to get this whole poem—a lot of modernist poets took refuge and pleasure in the obscure—but I laughed at Part I. When you get outside yourself, out of your own head, you can get simple pretty fast.
How I’ve skimmed over my life—is that what I’ve done?
There’s a quote by poet Rabindranath Tagore: “Let your life lightly dance on the verge of Time like a dew on the tip of a leaf.” My mom, Lynne, however, quoted it thusly, a different translation and a better rhythm in English, and it’s been a mantra: “Let your life lightly dance on the edges of time like the dew on the tip of a leaf.” I wrote out that version of the quotation and had it taped inside a floral cloth-covered three-ringed binder I carried all through high school. I added other quotes from Lynne (as I now recall them, accurately or not) that included Thackery, “The world is a looking-glass and gives back to each man the reflection of his own face,” and how true is that; and Milton, ‘The mind is its own place and in itself can make a hell of heaven, a heaven of hell.” And somewhere I wrote down two Thoreau quotes, “I would rather sit alone on a pumpkin and have it all to myself than be crowded on a velvet cushion,” which my mom quoted by way of explaining a store in our nearby Springfield Mall called The Velvet Pumpkin; the second was one Lynne intoned, to show Henry’s self-contraction, “A man need not be so poor that he must sit on a pumpkin, for that is shiftlessness.” It made her grin. Well, not grin, exactly, and not smile, and not smirk—Lynne had a way with her lips and face that showed she got a kick out of something that I have yet to find the verb for. The search continues.
From the first day of teaching, each day on the chalkboard in all my classrooms, I wrote a Thought for the Day—I’ve told you this—and I was charmed by to see kids copy them out in their own notebooks. The words to say it—the thing, whatever it is; it’s why words matter so much, why writers matter so much.
The first writer I connected to was one I discovered not through his writing but through a BBC production on Masterpiece Theater called Lillie, about Lillie Langtry, a woman who completely beguiled a poet and personality called Oscar Wilde. It’s was the quips that did it, so quotable and so unexpected. “I can resist everything except temptation.” My mom thought I just fell in love with the actor who played him, Peter Egan, but that wasn’t it. It was Wilde’s words, his life and the way he lived it. Then age 15, I went to the Potomac Library and found everything I could by and on Wilde—Wilde’s plays were my first search. Lynne, who had started working at Crown Books, bought me his one novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray and his children’s stories, The Happy Prince and the Selfish Giant. I wrote my senior English research paper on that novel and Wilde (the paper focusing on the absurd Victorian conceit that anyone with a beautiful face could not possibly be a bad person). I was deeply disappointed in the one biography I found, by Sheridan Morley, which seemed to discount Wilde’s genius and dismiss him for his homosexuality. (Richard Ellman would correct that reduction several years later.)

So my first writer love, the one who was my spirit guide through my teens into my early 20s, was Oscar Wilde (1854-1900), a bisexual (but, really, gay) man and father of two sons. And the two writers who have guided me through my life since are two highly unusual, if also white, women: Virginia Woolf (1882-1941), a childless though married bisexual woman (though consummation, as you might think of it, wasn’t really part of her life), in my 30s and 40s; and Patti Smith (b. 1946), whose first love Robert Mapplethorpe was bisexual (but, really, gay) and who married (and was widowed) and had two children, in my 50s and 60s. Wilde, Woolf, and Smith couldn’t be more different humans or writers, their European origins and connections to dissolving gender norms notwithstanding. (See Wilde’s life, Woolf’s novel Orlando, and Patti Smith’s photo on the cover of her debut album Horses for reference.)
Another thing these writers have in common was the desire for pilgrimage of a kind. Wilde famously camped outside Lillie Langtry’s London home and lectured all over America, even in mining camps, to let those American pilgrims bask in his genius; Woolf traveled with her siblings to Greece and other ancient places to see the origins of Classical literature; and for Smith, pilgrimage to the graves of writers such as Plath, Rimbaud, and Genet was a spiritual need.
Following the publishing of The Year of the Monkey, Smith participated in a really good interview at the University of Chicago, which I recommend.
In one of her questions, the interviewer asks about Smith’s need to “reinscribe” her subjects, and this word gets Patti’s attention, “I don’t know that word, I like that,” and she moves to write it down, patting her pockets for her notebook and pen, which are not there, and that gesture moved me. Still today, Patti Smith can be found in global cafes scribbling lines into notebooks and onto paper napkins; my last night at Maxwell’s bar in Blacksburg, Virginia, ca. 1987 was with my theater mentor Maureen, who said so many things worth recording (in what I think of as her final tutorial for me), that I left the bar with a small stack of cocktail napkins to stuff into my backpack. Mo said, “That’s what’s special about you, Lisa.” I didn’t know what she meant. Doesn’t everyone grab napkins to write down important words, ideas, snatches of conversation? I started paying more attention to the habits of others. As I saw with my students, the handful who copied out my Thoughts for the Day, it’s a special club—not unique to one of us, mind, but to a certain sort of person who scribbles and sketches hastily and in public, whether artists or composers or writers, to grab the overheard, or “overseen,” and record the impression.
What makes you special? Who makes up your tribe? What gestures have shown you that connection?

I heard Patti (I call her Patti now) say once in an interview at Cooper Union that she never had any great gift or talent, but she worked hard at what she loved. (In a similar way, I heard Cher say on The Graham Norton Show that her mom said to her early in her life, “You won’t be the prettiest one, you won’t be the best singer, but there is something special about you,” and to never to forget that; and it was the best thing a mom could say—telling the daughter to step away from the inevitable comparisons.) You find the magic inside yourself. Oscar, whose talents might seem limited to the nonreader of his work, and whose life might baffle or repulse some, had to live as himself and took the ultimate risk to do it. Virginia, whose works and style mostly do not speak to the general public (my friend Jean thinks she’s terrible), pushed past her own sufferings and the doubts of those around her (always encouraged by her husband, Leonard), and wrote, profoundly and prolifically, as herself. Patti, despite every seemingly impossible obstacle, pushed into the artistic world of New York City in the 1970s to sing and write and live as herself. I think there is something in all three that is pure love. A love of life, a need to express that love, is what keeps me coming back, worshiping at their altars, and growing into them.

All three writers (have) suffered in ways I cannot imagine. Oscar Wilde’s hubris and surety in being beloved as an artist betrayed him at his trial for sodomy and sent him to prison for two years’ hard labor; he lost his career and fortune, his wife, his children, his friends, and his home, and died at age 46. Virginia Woolf lost her beloved mother when she was 13, her older half-sister Stella when she was 15; then her difficult but also beloved father when she was 21, her brother Thoby when she was 24, so much loss; she battled mental illness all her life, a battle that ended in suicide at age 59 during yet another World War that bombed her beloved London to bits; Patti Smith gave up a baby for adoption at a teenager, lost her best friend and fellow artist Robert Mapplethorpe to AIDS, lost her husband Fred Sonic Smith to heart failure at age 49, her beloved brother Todd of a massive stroke at age 42 just months later, and battled back into public life in New York City when she had to support her two young children. And bless her, Smith turns 80 December 30. She’s still performing and writing.
Through all their personal losses and traumas—to say nothing of all the political trials, natural disasters, wars, and horrors that humans can make of this world to which they were/have been witness—these artists lived as seekers, entertainers, creators, in love with the world in all its contradictions and catastrophes. It give us something to aspire to, I think, and to take heart from.
From prison at Reading Gaol, Wilde wrote:
Still, I am conscious now that behind all this beauty, satisfying though it may be, there is some spirit hidden of which the painted forms and shapes are but modes of manifestation, and it is with this spirit that I desire to become in harmony. I have grown tired of the articulate utterances of men and things. The Mystical in Art, the Mystical in Life, the Mystical in Nature this is what I am looking for. It is absolutely necessary for me to find it somewhere.
– Oscar Wilde, De Profundis
The surface of things. Looking at my own life this Sunday morning in a country of insanity daily manifest, I think of dreams—pilgrimage—lightly touching life—partial careers, mini-impacts, flashlight searches. And still seek the depths.

Let’s live, and live deeply, shall we? Somehow?
Sending love and any words that might help,
Miss O’













































